From Guidance to Emergence: Rethinking Spatial Storytelling

The role of the director is shifting, especially in the context of spatial design and interactive environments. It’s no longer about crafting a linear narrative through dialogue or exposition, but about building worlds — places where meaning is not told, but discovered. The viewer, or player, finds their perspective by moving through space. What used to be a story told in words is now an environment that unfolds. In this new medium, the director isn’t just a narrator — they’re more of a provider, a designer of possibility.

In traditional media, storytelling meant reduction: cut everything that doesn’t serve the plot. But in spatial and interactive mediums like games or virtual spaces — there isn’t just one “main thing.” There are multiple paths of interest, and the observer becomes an agent, a player. They choose their own journey. And that journey is not a clean arc; it’s layered, fractal — arcs inside arcs. That’s how interest sustains itself in a complex medium: through nested patterns of discovery.

‍

Where Direction Ends and Discovery Begins

Directing today means not telling someone what to do. It’s about orchestrating environments where the player wants to do something. Where their wish becomes the engine of gameplay. The experience should not hold your hand. It should spark desire and curiosity. You don’t push the observer forward, but let them pull themselves into the world.

Recently I played a game where I felt the heavy hand of direction. I followed the flow, but I didn’t understand where I was going. It was polished, yes — but the voice of the director was loud in every moment. Go there. Do this. Don’t ask. I’m the director. It was like being led by the nose through someone else’s idea. No room to wander and no joy of getting lost.

This article started in that space — in the gap between direction and agency. Should I follow blindly, even if the experience is “well-made”? Or do we need to build entirely new muscles, new ways of inviting instead of instructing?

‍

Control and the Architecture of Fun

We know how to guide through dialogue, music, montage. But what about space?

Architecture has always guided human behaviour. Airports, train stations, temples — they don’t need text or voiceover to tell us where to go. But games are not airports. They must do more than route us, they must enchant us, foster spatial desire.

Good spatial storytelling doesn’t say “go here.” It makes you want to go. It’s the light behind the door, the ruined tower in the distance, the sound of water trickling beneath the floorboards. It’s the environmental equivalent of foreshadowing.

Yet, too often, game spaces become instructions in disguise. You follow arrows. You memorise button mappings. You work. And in that work, something dies.

To revive it, we must bring joy back into navigation. Not frivolous theme-park joy, but the joy of being cared for, even in difficulty. Games should be fun — and so, too, should be architecture. Serious spaces can have serious fun, if they treat movement as meaning.

‍

‍

‍

‍

In theatre, the stage is the center. You sit and observe: someone else plays.

In games, the idea of “play” shifts — now you are at the center.

The universe unfolds from where you stand.

This is not a small shift, it’s a tectonic one. It changes the grammar of storytelling: we’re not just looking at stories, we’re inside systems. The space is the storyteller. Lighting, rhythm, affordances — these things become dialogue and the world speaks without words.

It’s like a well-crafted illusion or a psychological trick: you’re asked to pick a number, add your birth date, divide by something, think of a word and suddenly the result feels inevitable, almost like fate. But in reality, it’s all carefully designed. The sense of free choice is preserved, but the outcome was directed from the beginning. That’s the kind of magic we’re talking about — the invisible hand of the creator, gently guiding without taking away your sense of agency. You feel completely in control, yet every moment has been thought through with care and intention.

‍

Designing Desire, Not Instructions

What makes a space meaningful is not that it tells you what to do, but that it makes you want to do something. That’s the real directorial muscle we need to grow. In screenwriting, we talk about arcs. In spatial design, we need to talk about desire paths. The curves people carve into the world when left to their own devices. The routes they invent and the rhythm they bring.

Games should give you that rhythm. You want to go there, but can’t yet. You see something interesting — and you have to figure out how to reach it. Not through a pop-up or UI element, but through spatial recognition. You climb, fall, struggle, succeed — and then find out what you wanted wasn’t even that great. But now, something else catches your eye. That’s the journey.

In 2D games, you move right and jump. Simple. But in 3D games — and in life — the directions are conceptual and emotional. You move toward meaning.

‍

‍

‍

From Authors to Ecosystem Builders

The director of the future is less like an architect of a fixed building and more like a gardener, a designer of ecosystems. Not placing every brick, but planting seeds, allowing growth and watching patterns emerge. Control exists, yes — but it’s macro. Like bonsai: you care, you shape, but you don’t dominate. You guide growth, not dictate outcome.

There’s joy in this unpredictability. In seeing what the system becomes, even surprising yourself. Even the creator stands in awe. We need tools that allow us to play, change, and play again — dreams that evolve in real time. Speak to the machine, iterate instantly, create dynamically. The process of making becomes part of the game itself.

Interplay with production becomes as vibrant as interplay with the finished system.

‍

The Language Yet to Come

We’re on the threshold of a new language — or maybe many languages — for experience. Nonlinear, emotional and spatial. It’s no longer just about writing stories, it’s about building conditions where stories emerge. It’s about listening to space, listening to systems. Understanding that authorship might not mean “saying everything,” but saying just enough and letting the world speak.

Let the player feel they are the center — not because we say so, but because we made a universe that grows from their presence.

This is not about giving up control. It’s about designing freedom with meaning, designing for self-discovery.

Not stealing the possibility of interpretation, but opening the world so that interpretation is inevitable. We are not at the end of storytelling — we are at its beginning, and it is becoming spatial.

‍

Text: Maxim Zhestkov
Illustrations: Andrei Masalkin